<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FDR Controverys Part 1: The (flawed) cult claim.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.memeverse.com/2009/07/09/fdr-controverys-part-1-the-flawed-cult-claim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2009/07/09/fdr-controverys-part-1-the-flawed-cult-claim/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:01:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Molyneux</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2009/07/09/fdr-controverys-part-1-the-flawed-cult-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-1147</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Molyneux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/?p=261#comment-1147</guid>
		<description>Thanks, this was a very interesting read. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, this was a very interesting read. <img src='http://www.memeverse.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FDR Controversy Part 3: Response to the &#8220;analysis&#8221; of Molyneux&#8217; response to the UK Guardian article</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2009/07/09/fdr-controverys-part-1-the-flawed-cult-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>FDR Controversy Part 3: Response to the &#8220;analysis&#8221; of Molyneux&#8217; response to the UK Guardian article</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/?p=261#comment-1122</guid>
		<description>[...] into such relationships or instilled unchosen positive obligations towards them. I would defer to part 1 for further examination of that (re all manipulation, control, dishonesty etc. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] into such relationships or instilled unchosen positive obligations towards them. I would defer to part 1 for further examination of that (re all manipulation, control, dishonesty etc. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FDR Controversy Part 4: &#8220;I would like to ask you to stop posting here&#8221;.</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2009/07/09/fdr-controverys-part-1-the-flawed-cult-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>FDR Controversy Part 4: &#8220;I would like to ask you to stop posting here&#8221;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/?p=261#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>[...] and what will he allow them to do with it. Does that alone make him a cult leader? Obviously not. Far more is required for that to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and what will he allow them to do with it. Does that alone make him a cult leader? Obviously not. Far more is required for that to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FDR Controversy Part 2: A &#8220;brief&#8221; misrepresentation of FDR</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2009/07/09/fdr-controverys-part-1-the-flawed-cult-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>FDR Controversy Part 2: A &#8220;brief&#8221; misrepresentation of FDR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/?p=261#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>[...] FDRLiberated.com appears to be the most coherent collection of information regarding the &#8220;big picture&#8221; about Freedomain Radio, but judging from this &#8220;brief introduction&#8221; which I wish to respond to here, it begins to seem more like an anti-FDR web site that politely presents some rather impolite ideas about it. It is not that these ideas are impolite simply because they are critical or negative towards FDR, but because they are, at least or especially in this &#8220;brief introduction&#8221;, presented like a one sided story without much references to evidence short of a link to a mess that is the Liberated Minds forum (hosting all kinds of fragmented opinions from different people some of which I&#8217;ve addressed in part 1). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FDRLiberated.com appears to be the most coherent collection of information regarding the &#8220;big picture&#8221; about Freedomain Radio, but judging from this &#8220;brief introduction&#8221; which I wish to respond to here, it begins to seem more like an anti-FDR web site that politely presents some rather impolite ideas about it. It is not that these ideas are impolite simply because they are critical or negative towards FDR, but because they are, at least or especially in this &#8220;brief introduction&#8221;, presented like a one sided story without much references to evidence short of a link to a mess that is the Liberated Minds forum (hosting all kinds of fragmented opinions from different people some of which I&#8217;ve addressed in part 1). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exploring the Freedomain Radio controversy (Part 0)</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2009/07/09/fdr-controverys-part-1-the-flawed-cult-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>Exploring the Freedomain Radio controversy (Part 0)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/?p=261#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>[...] FDR Controverys Part 1: The (flawed) cult claim. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FDR Controverys Part 1: The (flawed) cult claim. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

