<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Hans Reiser? (updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:01:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elda Guarno</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/comment-page-2/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>Elda Guarno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 02:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just curious. How could she risk to get pregnant with this sex addicted all-time unfaithful dude after one year dating? PEOPLE USE CONDOMS PLEASE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just curious. How could she risk to get pregnant with this sex addicted all-time unfaithful dude after one year dating? PEOPLE USE CONDOMS PLEASE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the big deal even if he did it? I can understand killing your wife, and that&#039;s one of the good reasons I don&#039;t plan on getting married. 

Now seriously, the common law system is a joke, what makes the jury competent to give any opinion, you might as well roll the dice, it would probably be more accurate, statistically.

And on the other hand, even if he&#039;s guilty, though he&#039;d be stupid to admit it, I think we&#039;d be better off if we at least allow him to continue his work. At least let him be on house arrest or something. I guess ok, lock him up for a couple of years to teach him a lesson, but this is getting too much already.

Now with his 25 year imprisonment, which in my country is the maximum you can possibly get for any crime, he&#039;ll be out of prison at 65, when I don&#039;t think he&#039;ll still be the most effective software developer.

This is crazy, a guy like this could come up with something revolutionary, you never know, one we could all benefit from, and keeping him locked up will  deprive man kind of his potential contribution.

On a footnote, the us govt is probably using him for some of their own secret shady stuff, which is something that we call exploitation.

And yea, I have ReiserFS on my boot partition, and it&#039;s quite fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the big deal even if he did it? I can understand killing your wife, and that&#8217;s one of the good reasons I don&#8217;t plan on getting married. </p>
<p>Now seriously, the common law system is a joke, what makes the jury competent to give any opinion, you might as well roll the dice, it would probably be more accurate, statistically.</p>
<p>And on the other hand, even if he&#8217;s guilty, though he&#8217;d be stupid to admit it, I think we&#8217;d be better off if we at least allow him to continue his work. At least let him be on house arrest or something. I guess ok, lock him up for a couple of years to teach him a lesson, but this is getting too much already.</p>
<p>Now with his 25 year imprisonment, which in my country is the maximum you can possibly get for any crime, he&#8217;ll be out of prison at 65, when I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll still be the most effective software developer.</p>
<p>This is crazy, a guy like this could come up with something revolutionary, you never know, one we could all benefit from, and keeping him locked up will  deprive man kind of his potential contribution.</p>
<p>On a footnote, the us govt is probably using him for some of their own secret shady stuff, which is something that we call exploitation.</p>
<p>And yea, I have ReiserFS on my boot partition, and it&#8217;s quite fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MicroConsole</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/comment-page-1/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>MicroConsole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 20:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, sometimes the prosecutor was misquoted by the media or might be the case was wrongfully wrote. As a matter of fact what we should believe that the let police and the prosecutors do their job until they were proven wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, sometimes the prosecutor was misquoted by the media or might be the case was wrongfully wrote. As a matter of fact what we should believe that the let police and the prosecutors do their job until they were proven wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/comment-page-1/#comment-1157</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/#comment-1157</guid>
		<description>What it comes down to is, some people (group 1) saw the evidence and felt that it indicated Mr. Reiser was guilty. Others (group 2) saw the evidence and felt that there was reasonable doubt over whether Mr. Reiser was guilty. Those people in group 2 were wrong, and thankfully most of the people on the jury were not members of group 2. Perhaps they were not blinded by emotional connections with Mr. Reiser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What it comes down to is, some people (group 1) saw the evidence and felt that it indicated Mr. Reiser was guilty. Others (group 2) saw the evidence and felt that there was reasonable doubt over whether Mr. Reiser was guilty. Those people in group 2 were wrong, and thankfully most of the people on the jury were not members of group 2. Perhaps they were not blinded by emotional connections with Mr. Reiser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: use stationary bikes</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/comment-page-1/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>use stationary bikes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, sometimes the prosecutor was misquoted by the media or might be the case was wrongfully wrote. As a matter of fact what we should believe that the let police and the prosecutors do their job until they were proven wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, sometimes the prosecutor was misquoted by the media or might be the case was wrongfully wrote. As a matter of fact what we should believe that the let police and the prosecutors do their job until they were proven wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: small sleeper sofa</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/comment-page-1/#comment-1142</link>
		<dc:creator>small sleeper sofa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/#comment-1142</guid>
		<description>I never trust a jury. Too bad that for serious offenses you must go through a jury trial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never trust a jury. Too bad that for serious offenses you must go through a jury trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regenia Villamarin</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/comment-page-1/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>Regenia Villamarin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>I think this write up was really a solid beginning to a potential series of posts about this topic. A lot of users pretend to understand what they are talking about when it comes to this area and in reality, very few people actually get it. You seem to grasp it however, so I think you should run with it. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this write up was really a solid beginning to a potential series of posts about this topic. A lot of users pretend to understand what they are talking about when it comes to this area and in reality, very few people actually get it. You seem to grasp it however, so I think you should run with it. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/#comment-827</guid>
		<description>I agree with you about Andrew. About Anton, he was speaking before the murder case was as clear cut, albeit the jews thing is a little paranoid and IMHO misses the point. But you also &quot;refuted&quot; me and Kevin who never supported the murder nor implied murderers should go free acting as if we did. Kevin was talking about a more balanced system of justice which revolves around reparations rather than punishment and was also speaking *before* the body, as the primary evidence necessary, was found. He in no way said murderers should go free.

And myself, I originally thought that people are jumping to conclusions prematurely and felt that all evidence they had at the time was weak if they couldn&#039;t find the body. Once they did I UPDATED the post, as you can see, saying I was wrong and clarifying my position.

Your reply to Kevin was to call him a &quot;kook&quot; and misrepresenting what he said (that murderers can go free). That&#039;s not much of a rebuttal. It&#039;s just a stupid ad hominem.

And your &quot;rebuttal&quot; of me was complete misrepresentation, as if I was advocating freedom to take another&#039;s life or that killers should go free. You&#039;re not refuting me there, but your own image of me based on what I never said.

As for &quot;eye for an eye&quot;, alright, I guess you&#039;re not advocating that, which is good. I don&#039;t advocate punishment either, but reparations, as Kevin described it. Justice isn&#039;t about revenge (which is what punishment is), but about repairing the damage as far as it can be repaired.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you about Andrew. About Anton, he was speaking before the murder case was as clear cut, albeit the jews thing is a little paranoid and IMHO misses the point. But you also &#8220;refuted&#8221; me and Kevin who never supported the murder nor implied murderers should go free acting as if we did. Kevin was talking about a more balanced system of justice which revolves around reparations rather than punishment and was also speaking *before* the body, as the primary evidence necessary, was found. He in no way said murderers should go free.</p>
<p>And myself, I originally thought that people are jumping to conclusions prematurely and felt that all evidence they had at the time was weak if they couldn&#8217;t find the body. Once they did I UPDATED the post, as you can see, saying I was wrong and clarifying my position.</p>
<p>Your reply to Kevin was to call him a &#8220;kook&#8221; and misrepresenting what he said (that murderers can go free). That&#8217;s not much of a rebuttal. It&#8217;s just a stupid ad hominem.</p>
<p>And your &#8220;rebuttal&#8221; of me was complete misrepresentation, as if I was advocating freedom to take another&#8217;s life or that killers should go free. You&#8217;re not refuting me there, but your own image of me based on what I never said.</p>
<p>As for &#8220;eye for an eye&#8221;, alright, I guess you&#8217;re not advocating that, which is good. I don&#8217;t advocate punishment either, but reparations, as Kevin described it. Justice isn&#8217;t about revenge (which is what punishment is), but about repairing the damage as far as it can be repaired.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bon Onya</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/comment-page-1/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Bon Onya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/#comment-826</guid>
		<description>I very clearly refuted nonsense point by point.  If you can refute anything that I posted, please let me know.

Or, you can continue to put words in my mouth and call me &quot;sad&quot; and &quot;pathetic&quot;.

In my book, people who have crushes on murderers are sad and pathetic.

Nobody here defended murder?  Let&#039;s see:

Andrew Theo Says:

&quot;Yes, I see : Hans did it.
But what jury in this or the other world could judge him ??
I mean, the women took his money, his children, his company, his life work, his dignity.
Who can realy put a blame on this man ?
I do not….and, maybe neither should you : look inside you, and try to put yourselves in his shoes.&quot;

As far as your nonsense about &quot;eye for an eye&quot;, an &quot;eye for an eye&quot; in this case would have been a sentence of death by strangulation. Clearly, that didn&#039;t happen. As a matter of fact, the murderer has a chance to leave prison if he lives long enough!  Clearly not &quot;eye for an eye&quot;.

On the contrary, people here seem to be advocating the extreme opposite of an eye for an eye, which is that murderers should go free.

Disagree with anything I&#039;ve said?  Please let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very clearly refuted nonsense point by point.  If you can refute anything that I posted, please let me know.</p>
<p>Or, you can continue to put words in my mouth and call me &#8220;sad&#8221; and &#8220;pathetic&#8221;.</p>
<p>In my book, people who have crushes on murderers are sad and pathetic.</p>
<p>Nobody here defended murder?  Let&#8217;s see:</p>
<p>Andrew Theo Says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes, I see : Hans did it.<br />
But what jury in this or the other world could judge him ??<br />
I mean, the women took his money, his children, his company, his life work, his dignity.<br />
Who can realy put a blame on this man ?<br />
I do not….and, maybe neither should you : look inside you, and try to put yourselves in his shoes.&#8221;</p>
<p>As far as your nonsense about &#8220;eye for an eye&#8221;, an &#8220;eye for an eye&#8221; in this case would have been a sentence of death by strangulation. Clearly, that didn&#8217;t happen. As a matter of fact, the murderer has a chance to leave prison if he lives long enough!  Clearly not &#8220;eye for an eye&#8221;.</p>
<p>On the contrary, people here seem to be advocating the extreme opposite of an eye for an eye, which is that murderers should go free.</p>
<p>Disagree with anything I&#8217;ve said?  Please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/comment-page-1/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memeverse.com/2008/05/02/free-hans-reiser/#comment-825</guid>
		<description>Are you done Bon? You are being more emotional than rational and your posts reflect that. It&#039;s like you came here solely to vent your frustration, as you say yourself. But doing it like this only makes &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; look like a sad fish in a barrel, you know. You might have as well posted a single comment and called everyone you disagree with an idiot and that would do.

Nobody here defended murder. At the time this entry and many of subsequent comments were written it was NOT clear if it was a murder or not, as evidence was NOT yet conclusive, yet people were jumping to conclusions. This isn&#039;t some sort of a betting game where you get to bet on one or the other outcome and then get paid in gloating rights. That&#039;s pathetic. That you&#039;re so quick to assume people here supported no sanctions for murder says more about you than them.

Also, regarding your put down of Kevin&#039;s voluntaryism, it appears you are one of those who believe in &quot;eye for an eye&quot;, perpetual escalation of violence as the solution to violence. Nothing can bring back life, that&#039;s for sure, but killing someone back and even life in prison wont do it either. It would indeed be nice if the murderer was thus offered an option to make it up to the family of the lost one as much as humanly possible (paying huge reparations) instead of costing tax payers, completely innocent people, for holding him and feeding him in some dumb jail cell.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you done Bon? You are being more emotional than rational and your posts reflect that. It&#8217;s like you came here solely to vent your frustration, as you say yourself. But doing it like this only makes <em>you</em> look like a sad fish in a barrel, you know. You might have as well posted a single comment and called everyone you disagree with an idiot and that would do.</p>
<p>Nobody here defended murder. At the time this entry and many of subsequent comments were written it was NOT clear if it was a murder or not, as evidence was NOT yet conclusive, yet people were jumping to conclusions. This isn&#8217;t some sort of a betting game where you get to bet on one or the other outcome and then get paid in gloating rights. That&#8217;s pathetic. That you&#8217;re so quick to assume people here supported no sanctions for murder says more about you than them.</p>
<p>Also, regarding your put down of Kevin&#8217;s voluntaryism, it appears you are one of those who believe in &#8220;eye for an eye&#8221;, perpetual escalation of violence as the solution to violence. Nothing can bring back life, that&#8217;s for sure, but killing someone back and even life in prison wont do it either. It would indeed be nice if the murderer was thus offered an option to make it up to the family of the lost one as much as humanly possible (paying huge reparations) instead of costing tax payers, completely innocent people, for holding him and feeding him in some dumb jail cell.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

